I really wish we could do something about this.
Look at the worldly and at the whole world that exalts itself above the people of God; are the image of God and his truth not distorted in it? They have science, and in science only that which is subject to the senses. But the spiritual world, the higher half of man’s being, is altogether rejected, banished with a sort of triumph, even with hatred. The world has proclaimed freedom, especially of late, but what do we see in this freedom of theirs; only slavery and suicide! For the world says: “You have needs, therefore satisfy them, for you have the same rights as the noblest and richest men. Do not be afraid to satisfy them, even increase them”—this is the current teaching of the world. And in this they see freedom. But what comes of this right to increase one’s needs? For the rich, isolation and spiritual suicide, for the poor, envy and murder, for they have been given rights, but have not yet been shown the say of satisfying their needs. We are assured that the world is becoming more and more united, is being transformed into brotherly communion, by the shortening of distances, by the transmitting of thoughts through the air. Alas, do not believe in such a union of people. Taking freedom to mean the increase and prompt satisfaction of needs, they distort their own nature, for they generate many meaningless and foolish desires, habits, and the most absurd fancies in themselves. They live only for mutual envy, for pleasure-seeking and self-display. To have dinners, horses, carriages, rank, and slaves to serve them is now considered such a necessity that for the sake of it, to satisfy it, they will sacrifice life, honor, the love of mankind, and even will kill themselves if they are unable to satisfy it. We see the same thing in those who are not rich, while the poor, so far, simply drown their unsatisfied needs and envy in drink. But soon they will get drunk on blood instead of wine, they are being led to that. I ask you: is such a man free?
Please explain your rationale for the rainbow.
Not poor Marvin Hamlisch necessarily, but poor me, and poor you, because Marvin Hamlisch is dead. This will cheer you up, though.
Actually, Papa John Schnatter, if you weren’t such a money-grubbing, Scrooge-like greedbag, you could have been providing your employees with the minimum insurance requirements for a long time, thus avoiding a sudden rise in costs, like, say, Starbucks. This right here makes me want to go eat at Chick-Fil-A.
Idiot reporter claims huge scoop because he’s decided a fact-checker who regularly disagrees with him is behaving unethically by—get this—*voting.*
I’ve met cats like this before.